Jackson v. Hader

W.D. Missouri

Jackson v. Hader

271 F. Supp. 990, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7217

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri

DecidedAugust 30, 1967

Docket1231

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 271 F. Supp. 990 (Jackson v. Hader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Hader, 271 F. Supp. 990, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7217 (W.D. Mo. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to file this civil complaint for damages in forma pauperis. Leave to so proceed is granted.

The action will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The complaint alleges certain misconduct by defendant *991 as plaintiff’s appointed defense counsel in the Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Missouri. The complaint does not allege diversity of citizenship. Further, the complaint does not state a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act, Sections 1981-1985, Title 42, United States Code, because a lawyer is not a person acting under color of state law within the meaning of the Act. Compare Rhodes v. Meyer, D.C.Neb.1963, 225 F.Supp. 80, at 93-94 and 107, affirmed 8th Cir. 1964, 334 F.2d 709, at 718, cert. denied 379 U.S. 915, 85 S.Ct. 263, 13 L.Ed.2d 186. The alleged fact that defendant was appointed counsel does not affect the application of the principles stated. Counsel appointed to represent indigent defendants represent such persons in an independent professional capacity; they do not represent the State nor does their representation constitute an action under color of state law within the meaning of the Civil Rights Act.

There being no other basis for jurisdiction, it is

Ordered that the complaint be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to file this civil complaint for damages in forma pauperis. Leave to so proceed is granted.

The action will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The complaint alleges certain misconduct by defendant *991 as plaintiff’s appointed defense counsel in the Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Missouri. The complaint does not allege diversity of citizenship. Further, the complaint does not state a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act, Sections 1981-1985, Title 42, United States Code, because a lawyer is not a person acting under color of state law within the meaning of the Act. Compare Rhodes v. Meyer, D.C.Neb.1963, 225 F.Supp. 80, at 93-94 and 107, affirmed 8th Cir. 1964, 334 F.2d 709, at 718, cert. denied 379 U.S. 915, 85 S.Ct. 263, 13 L.Ed.2d 186. The alleged fact that defendant was appointed counsel does not affect the application of the principles stated. Counsel appointed to represent indigent defendants represent such persons in an independent professional capacity; they do not represent the State nor does their representation constitute an action under color of state law within the meaning of the Civil Rights Act.

There being no other basis for jurisdiction, it is

Ordered that the complaint be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 F. Supp. 990, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-hader-mowd-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack