Jackson v. Goddard

1 Mass. 230
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1804
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mass. 230 (Jackson v. Goddard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Goddard, 1 Mass. 230 (Mass. 1804).

Opinion

By the Court.

The accident or mistake which hindered the entry of the action at the proper term, ought to be stated in the petition, that the Court may see whether the facts relied on are a sufficient ground for the interference of the Court. The statute of June 18, 1791 (stat. 1791, c. 17, <§> 1,) provides that when, in case of any accident, mistake, or unforeseen cause, an appeal, &c., is not entered at the proper term, this Court may, on the petition of the party, at their discretion, order the same to be entered.at another term, &c. As the statute has not defined or described what is an accident, mistake, &c., it is left for the Court, in their discretion, to determine ; and unless it be stated in the petition, it is impossible for us to know whether there is reasonable ground to order notice to the adverse party to show cause. Let the petition be amended, and the accident or mistake specified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mass. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-goddard-mass-1804.