Jackson v. Gayden
This text of 46 Ga. 645 (Jackson v. Gayden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The cases of Sirrine, administrator, vs. The Southwestern Railroad Company, 43 Georgia, 280, and of Pace vs. Williams, 44 Georgia, must control the present case upon the question of the tax affidavit required by the Act of 1870. Under those decisions no affidavit is necessary.
2. The fact that there is an amendable defect in the declaration, which, if not amended, would have authorized a dismissal of the case, will not justify this Court in sustaining the Court below in dismissing the case for want of the tax affidavit. Had a motion been made to dismiss the case on account of the defect, the declaration could, and probably would, have been amended to meet the objection.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Ga. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-gayden-ga-1872.