Jackson v. Gaulden

82 So. 816, 78 Fla. 226
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 31, 1919·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected,, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Gaulden, 82 So. 816, 78 Fla. 226 (Fla. 1919).

82 So. 816 (Jackson v. Gaulden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.