Jackson v. Flambeau Airmold Corp.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Jackson v. Flambeau Airmold Corp.

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided March 19, 2002·No. I.C. NOS. 636132, 711319·Published

Opinion

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the competent evidence of record. Having found no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or hear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission AFFIRMS the Order of Dismissal of the Deputy Commissioner and plaintiff's claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This the ___ day of March 2002.

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*********** The undersigned have reviewed the competent evidence of record. Having found no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or hear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission AFFIRMS the Order of Dismissal of the Deputy Commissioner and plaintiff's claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This the ___ day of March 2002.

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

Jackson v. Flambeau Airmold Corp., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Pincite

Jackson v. Flambeau Airmold Corp. (Jackson v. Flambeau Airmold Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.