Jackson v. Fischer

57 A.D.3d 1122, 868 N.Y.2d 554
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 11, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 57 A.D.3d 1122 (Jackson v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Fischer, 57 A.D.3d 1122, 868 N.Y.2d 554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Petitioner was found guilty of disobeying a direct order, failing to comply with frisk procedures and violating facility movement regulations. He thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul that determination. The Attorney General, however, has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, petitioner has been afforded [1123]*1123all of the relief to which he is entitled and this matter must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Hale v Maly, 51 AD3d 1232, 1233 [2008]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MatterofOppenheimervGriffin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Oppenheimer v. Griffin
123 A.D.3d 1214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 1122, 868 N.Y.2d 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2008.