Jackson v. Fischer
This text of 57 A.D.3d 1122 (Jackson v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner was found guilty of disobeying a direct order, failing to comply with frisk procedures and violating facility movement regulations. He thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul that determination. The Attorney General, however, has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, petitioner has been afforded [1123]*1123all of the relief to which he is entitled and this matter must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Hale v Maly, 51 AD3d 1232, 1233 [2008]).
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 A.D.3d 1122, 868 N.Y.2d 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2008.