Jackson v. Ferris

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jackson v. Ferris

8 A. 435, 5 Sadler 302

DecidedMarch 7, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A. 435 (Jackson v. Ferris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Ferris, 8 A. 435, 5 Sadler 302 (Pa. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There was no error committed in the admission of evidence (Pratt v. Patterson, 81 Pa. 114), nor in rejecting the evidence offered by the plaintiffs. The specific evidence offered was not admissible in itself; and the offer to follow it by other evidence, in no manner connected therewith and never offered by itself, did not help the plaintiff’s ease.

The case is one mainly of fact, and as all the evidence failed to prove the fact alleged, the case was properly ruled by the court.

Judgment affirmed.^

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

There was no error committed in the admission of evidence (Pratt v. Patterson, 81 Pa. 114), nor in rejecting the evidence offered by the plaintiffs. The specific evidence offered was not admissible in itself; and the offer to follow it by other evidence, in no manner connected therewith and never offered by itself, did not help the plaintiff’s ease.

The case is one mainly of fact, and as all the evidence failed to prove the fact alleged, the case was properly ruled by the court.

Judgment affirmed.^

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A. 435, 5 Sadler 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-ferris-pa-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack