Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Jackson v. Feit

Jackson v. Feit

594 So. 2d 869, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2658, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 689
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1085
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 594 So. 2d 869 (Jackson v. Feit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Feit, 594 So. 2d 869, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2658, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 689 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in denying their motions to amend and for continuance. The manner in which this ease was set for trial violated both the letter and the spirit of Rule 1.440(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (1991), concerning the method in which cases should be noticed and scheduled for trial. Cf. Ramos v. Menks, 509 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Feinberg
745 So. 2d 500 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Roggemann v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
670 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
594 So. 2d 869, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2658, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-feit-fladistctapp-1992.