Jackson v. Ehrsam

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. Ehrsam

123 N.Y.S. 986

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 123 N.Y.S. 986 (Jackson v. Ehrsam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Ehrsam, 123 N.Y.S. 986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff against defendant, who was a tenant of one Erkins under a written lease. Erkins assigned the rents due and to become due under said lease to plaintiff as collateral security for a loan. Notice of the assignment was given to the defendant, who nevertheless continued to pay the rents to Er-kins. Thereupon this action was brought. Before the answer was interposed, Erkins paid the plaintiff the full amount of the loan and received a receipt in full and a satisfaction piece, all of which is in evidence under an agreed state of facts.

Under these circumstances, plaintiff had no further interest in the rents, and the complaint should have been dismissed. In Jackson v. Erkins, 131 App. Div. 801, 116 N. Y. Supp. 385, an order having been made directing the attorney of the present plaintiff to surrender the lease and assignments on the ground that the mortgage had been paid, the Appellate Division reversed the same, holding that the attorney had a lien on these papers, which, under the circumstances, was not defeated or impaired by the satisfaction of the debt. In the case at bar, however, we are concerned with the interest of the plaintiff herself in the rents, and such interests have entirely ceased after the payment of the debt to her, and upon her certifying to that effect.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIJUR, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff against defendant, who was a tenant of one Erkins under a written lease. Erkins assigned the rents due and to become due under said lease to plaintiff as collateral security for a loan. Notice of the assignment was given to the defendant, who nevertheless continued to pay the rents to Er-kins. Thereupon this action was brought. Before the answer was interposed, Erkins paid the plaintiff the full amount of the loan and received a receipt in full and a satisfaction piece, all of which is in evidence under an agreed state of facts.

Under these circumstances, plaintiff had no further interest in the rents, and the complaint should have been dismissed. In Jackson v. Erkins, 131 App. Div. 801, 116 N. Y. Supp. 385, an order having been made directing the attorney of the present plaintiff to surrender the lease and assignments on the ground that the mortgage had been paid, the Appellate Division reversed the same, holding that the attorney had a lien on these papers, which, under the circumstances, was not defeated or impaired by the satisfaction of the debt. In the case at bar, however, we are concerned with the interest of the plaintiff herself in the rents, and such interests have entirely ceased after the payment of the debt to her, and upon her certifying to that effect.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 N.Y.S. 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-ehrsam-nyappterm-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack