Jackson v. Dwight

78 F. 896, 24 C.C.A. 380, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 24, 1896
DocketNo. 532
StatusPublished

This text of 78 F. 896 (Jackson v. Dwight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Dwight, 78 F. 896, 24 C.C.A. 380, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309 (5th Cir. 1896).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the circuit court a jury was waived by stipulation in writing, and thereupon the court made a special finding of facts in the case. The errors assigned are substantially to the effect that the facts as found by the court, under the pleadings in the ease, do not warrant the judgment rendered. A careful examination of the pleadings and findings satisfies us that the findings fully support the judgment, and that there is no room, under the facts as found, for the application of the maxim, “In pari delicto melior est conditio defendentis.” The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 F. 896, 24 C.C.A. 380, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-dwight-ca5-1896.