Jackson v. Dunham

Eighth Circuit

Jackson v. Dunham

333 F. App'x 149

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 9, 2009

DocketNo. 08-2671

StatusPublished

This text of 333 F. App'x 149 (Jackson v. Dunham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Dunham, 333 F. App'x 149 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Jackson appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action. Upon de novo review, see Ramlet v. E.F. Johnson Co., 507 F.3d 1149, 1152 (8th Cir.2007), [150]*150we hold that summary judgment was properly granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Jackson appeals the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action. Upon de novo review, see Ramlet v. E.F. Johnson Co., 507 F.3d 1149, 1152 (8th Cir.2007), [150]*150we hold that summary judgment was properly granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

333 F. App'x 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-dunham-ca8-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack