Jackson v. Dubray

56 A.D.2d 919, 867 N.Y.S.2d 750

This text of 56 A.D.2d 919 (Jackson v. Dubray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Dubray, 56 A.D.2d 919, 867 N.Y.S.2d 750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in two separate misbehavior reports with engaging in violent conduct, attempting to assault a staff member, refusing a direct order and committing an unhygienic act. Following a combined tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with the related documentation, photographs and testimony adduced at the hearing, comprise substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Boley v Selsky, 50 AD3d 1411, 1412 [2008]). To the extent that petitioner offered a retaliation defense, a credibility issue was created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Kearney v Fischer, 51 AD3d 1185, 1186 [2008]). Petitioner’s assertion that he was deprived of adequate employee assistance is unsubstantiated by the record and, in any event, there is no indication that he suffered any prejudice as a result of the purported deficiencies (see Matter of Gonzalez v Fischer, 53 AD3d 945, 946 [2008]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims that he was denied the right to present witness testimony and that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been scrutinized and found to be without merit.

Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boley v. Selsky
50 A.D.3d 1411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Kearney v. Fischer
51 A.D.3d 1185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Gonzalez v. Fischer
53 A.D.3d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.D.2d 919, 867 N.Y.S.2d 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-dubray-nyappdiv-2008.