Jackson v. Daniel
This text of Jackson v. Daniel (Jackson v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 22-50558 Document: 00516487024 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 22-50558 September 28, 2022 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
Billy Ray Jackson,
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
Bryan Daniel, in his individual capacity; Julian Alvarez, III, in his individual capacity; Aaron Demerson, in his individual capacity,
Defendants—Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:21-CV-1107
Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Billy Ray Jackson filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in forma pauperis contesting Texas’s withdrawal, under 15 U.S.C. § 9025(a)(1), from the supplemental unemployment benefits provided under the CARES Act.
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 22-50558 Document: 00516487024 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2022
No. 22-50558
Given that the statute expressly allows such a withdrawal upon providing thirty days’ written notice (which Texas did), the district court dismissed the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Jackson’s appellate brief fails to demonstrate any error in this determination. We AFFIRM. Jackson’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jackson v. Daniel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-daniel-ca5-2022.