Jackson v. Dade County School Board

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jackson v. Dade County School Board

411 So. 2d 1033, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19587

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 1, 1982

DocketNo. AD-495

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 411 So. 2d 1033 (Jackson v. Dade County School Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Dade County School Board, 411 So. 2d 1033, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19587 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The claimant raises five issues on appeal, only one of which has merit. In denying the claim for continuing medical care, the deputy commissioner expressly relied on the report of a Dr. Antonio Prats. This report is not in the record, nor does the record show that it was admitted into evidence. The case must be remanded so that the [1034]*1034deputy commissioner may determine whether Prats’ report should have been included and, if not, whether the medical evidence in the existing record supports the order.

The denial of the claim for continued treatment is reversed and the cause remanded; all other portions of the order are affirmed.

MILLS, LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The claimant raises five issues on appeal, only one of which has merit. In denying the claim for continuing medical care, the deputy commissioner expressly relied on the report of a Dr. Antonio Prats. This report is not in the record, nor does the record show that it was admitted into evidence. The case must be remanded so that the [1034]*1034deputy commissioner may determine whether Prats’ report should have been included and, if not, whether the medical evidence in the existing record supports the order.

The denial of the claim for continued treatment is reversed and the cause remanded; all other portions of the order are affirmed.

MILLS, LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

411 So. 2d 1033, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-dade-county-school-board-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack