Jackson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

TERESA J.1, No.: 3:17-cv-01453-SU

Plaintiff, ORDER

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [27] on March 31, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees [26]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

1 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal

principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Sullivan’s Findings and Recommendation [27]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees [26] is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED.

April 27, 2020 DATED: ___________________________.

_________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge