Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security (Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 JULIE JACKSON, CASE NO. C19-304 MJP 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EAJA FEES 12 v. 13 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the 19 total amount of $2,890.88 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), shall 20 be awarded to Plaintiff. Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 21 If the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not 22 subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the 23 check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Amy Gilbrough. 24 1 Whether the check is made payable to Plaintiff, or to Amy Gilbrough, the check shall be 2 mailed to Ms. Gilbrough at the following address: 1904 Third Ave., Suite 1030, Seattle, 3 Washington 98101. 4
5 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 6 Dated March 11, 2020.
A 7 8 Marsha J. Pechman 9 United States District Judge
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-commissioner-of-social-security-wawd-2020.