Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided March 11, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-00304·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JULIE JACKSON, CASE NO. C19-304 MJP Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EAJA FEES v. SECURITY, Defendant. Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the total amount of $2,890.88 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), shall be awarded to Plaintiff. Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Amy Gilbrough. Whether the check is made payable to Plaintiff, or to Amy Gilbrough, the check shall be mailed to Ms. Gilbrough at the following address: 1904 Third Ave., Suite 1030, Seattle, Washington 98101.

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. Dated March 11, 2020.

A Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security (Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)