Jackson v. Columbus

862 N.E.2d 116, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1489
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 2007·No. 2006-2096·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 05AP-1035, 2006-0hio-5209. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law [1490] No. I.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and Cupp, JJ., dissent. Motion to strike notice of appeal and case information statement denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Columbus, 862 N.E.2d 116, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1489 (Ohio 2007).

862 N.E.2d 116 (Jackson v. Columbus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. City of Columbus
117 Ohio St. 3d 328 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)