Jackson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
538 So. 2d 12, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 892, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 694
Opinion
These two petitions for writ of mandamus raise the same issue: Is a party entitled to a jury trial in a retaliatory discharge action provided for in § 25-5-11.1, Code of Alabama 1975?
This question was answered in the affirmative by this Court’s extended opinion in Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc., 536 So.2d 1364 (Ala.1988) (on rehearing).
Accordingly, in Ex parte Jackson the writ is granted; and in Ex parte American Cast Iron Pipe Co. the writ is denied.
87-1512 WRIT GRANTED.
88-6 WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 538 So. 2d 12, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 892, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 694 (Ala. 1988).
538 So. 2d 12 (Jackson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.
536 So. 2d 1364 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)