Jackson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

538 So. 2d 12, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 892, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 694
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 23, 1988
Docket87-1512, 88-6
StatusPublished

This text of 538 So. 2d 12 (Jackson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 538 So. 2d 12, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 892, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 694 (Ala. 1988).

Opinion

SHORES, Justice.

These two petitions for writ of mandamus raise the same issue: Is a party entitled to a jury trial in a retaliatory discharge action provided for in § 25-5-11.1, Code of Alabama 1975?

This question was answered in the affirmative by this Court’s extended opinion in Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc., 536 So.2d 1364 (Ala.1988) (on rehearing).

Accordingly, in Ex parte Jackson the writ is granted; and in Ex parte American Cast Iron Pipe Co. the writ is denied.

87-1512 WRIT GRANTED.

88-6 WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.
536 So. 2d 1364 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 So. 2d 12, 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 892, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-coca-cola-bottling-co-ala-1988.