Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Jackson v. City of New York

Jackson v. City of New York

272 A.D.2d 581, 709 N.Y.S.2d 408, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6065
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 A.D.2d 708 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 30, 2000·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated August 4, 1999, which denied their motion for leave to amend the complaint and restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This Court dismissed the complaint in its entirety (see, Jackson v City of New York, 251 AD2d 457; Jackson v City of New York, 240 AD2d 708). The Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to grant leave to amend a complaint and restore an action to the trial calendar under these circumstances (see, CPLR 3025 [bl; Slater v American Min. Spirits Co., 33 NY2d 443, 447). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, S. Miller and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. City of New York, 272 A.D.2d 581, 709 N.Y.S.2d 408, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 581 (Jackson v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slater v. American Mineral Spirits Co.
310 N.E.2d 300 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Jackson v. City of New York
240 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Jackson v. City of New York
251 A.D.2d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)