Jackson v. Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Jackson v. Circuit Court

568 F. App'x 245

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 2014

DocketNo. 13-8053

StatusPublished

This text of 568 F. App'x 245 (Jackson v. Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Circuit Court, 568 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Cir. Ct. of Howard Cnty., No. l:13-cv-03219-RDB (D.Md. Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [246]*246the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Cir. Ct. of Howard Cnty., No. l:13-cv-03219-RDB (D.Md. Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [246]*246the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 F. App'x 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-circuit-court-ca4-2014.