Jackson v. Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Jackson v. Circuit Court

568 F. App'x 245

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13-8053·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Cir. Ct. of Howard Cnty., No. l:13-cv-03219-RDB (D.Md. Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [246] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Cir. Ct. of Howard Cnty., No. l:13-cv-03219-RDB (D.Md. Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [246] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jackson v. Circuit Court, 568 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

568 F. App'x 245 (Jackson v. Circuit Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.