Jackson v. Chambers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jackson v. Chambers

100 S.E. 659, 24 Ga. App. 285, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 572

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 20, 1919·No. 10288·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Rtepiiens, J.

The petition in this case plainly sot out an action for damages sounding in tort, and the recital therein of a contract may be treated merely as showing the relationship of the parties. The court erred in sustaining the demurrer interposed and in dismissing the petition. Paine v. Watters, 9 Ga. App. 265 (70 S. E. 1114).

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur. Emmett Smith, Buford Boykin, for plaintiff. Leon Ilood,.II. 0. Strickland, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rtepiiens, J.

The petition in this case plainly sot out an action for damages sounding in tort, and the recital therein of a contract may be treated merely as showing the relationship of the parties. The court erred in sustaining the demurrer interposed and in dismissing the petition. Paine v. Watters, 9 Ga. App. 265 (70 S. E. 1114).

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur. Emmett Smith, Buford Boykin, for plaintiff. Leon Ilood,.II. 0. Strickland, for defendant.

Jackson v. Chambers, 100 S.E. 659, 24 Ga. App. 285, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 572 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

100 S.E. 659 (Jackson v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related