Jackson v. Chambers

100 S.E. 659, 24 Ga. App. 285, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 572
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 20, 1919
Docket10288
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 S.E. 659 (Jackson v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Chambers, 100 S.E. 659, 24 Ga. App. 285, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 572 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Rtepiiens, J.

The petition in this case plainly sot out an action for damages sounding in tort, and the recital therein of a contract may be treated merely as showing the relationship of the parties. The court erred in sustaining the demurrer interposed and in dismissing the petition. Paine v. Watters, 9 Ga. App. 265 (70 S. E. 1114).

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur. Emmett Smith, Buford Boykin, for plaintiff. Leon Ilood,.II. 0. Strickland, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrell v. Anderson
294 F. Supp. 405 (S.D. Georgia, 1968)
Lancaster v. Brandt
13 S.E.2d 516 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 659, 24 Ga. App. 285, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-chambers-gactapp-1919.