Jackson v. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital Corp.
This text of 399 So. 2d 542 (Jackson v. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order requiring the defendant Jackson to answer the amended complaint is reversed because service of process, under the long arm statute or otherwise, has not been actually effected upon her. The appellant did not waive this jurisdictional requirement merely by filing an anticipatory motion to dismiss which unsuccessfully (and incorrectly) asserted that the long-arm provisions specifically invoked in the amended complaint could not, as a matter of law, be employed as to the claim in question. See, Huffman v. Heagy, 122 So.2d 335 (Fla.3d DCA 1960).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
399 So. 2d 542, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-cedars-of-lebanon-hospital-corp-fladistctapp-1981.