Jackson v. Bulifant

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. Bulifant

35 Misc. 823, 72 N.Y.S. 1108

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 823 (Jackson v. Bulifant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Bulifant, 35 Misc. 823, 72 N.Y.S. 1108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

All of the sales, except those to Worth & Co. and Lewis Marks, were evidenced by written sales-notes drawn by plaintiff himself. From these sales-notes, it appears that the so-called sales were conditional upon the buyer’s approval of the goods. They did not approve them and consequently no sale was effected. The plaintiff earned no commissions upon these [824]*824transactions. As to the Worth an’d Marks items, the evidence was conflicting and we see no reason to disturb the finding of the justice.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

All of the sales, except those to Worth & Co. and Lewis Marks, were evidenced by written sales-notes drawn by plaintiff himself. From these sales-notes, it appears that the so-called sales were conditional upon the buyer’s approval of the goods. They did not approve them and consequently no sale was effected. The plaintiff earned no commissions upon these [824]*824transactions. As to the Worth an’d Marks items, the evidence was conflicting and we see no reason to disturb the finding of the justice.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 823, 72 N.Y.S. 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-bulifant-nyappterm-1901.