Jackson v. Brown & Williamson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 2000
Docket00-30113
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jackson v. Brown & Williamson (Jackson v. Brown & Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Brown & Williamson, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30113 Summary Calendar

WADE P. JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION; R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY; PHILIP MORRIS, INC; LORRILARD TOBACCO CO; UNITED STATES TOBACCO CO; AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY; QUAGLINO TOBACCO & CANDY CO; J & R VENDING SERVICES; IMPERIAL TRADING, INC.; GEORGE GOETCH INC; LIGGETT GROUP INC,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-441 - - - - - - - - - - October 23, 2000

Before DAVIS, JONES and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wade P. Jackson, Louisiana prisoner # 113076, appeals from

the district court’s dismissal of his wrongful death and survival

cause of action against various tobacco companies. We have

reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and we

concluded that no reversible error was committed. Jackson’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-30113 -2-

cause of action was time-barred under applicable Louisiana law

one-year statute of limitations, La. Civ. Code. Ann. art. 3492.

The district court’s dismissal of all of the defendants is

AFFIRMED on the ground that Jackson’s claim was time-barred. See

Hanchey v. Energas Co., 925 F.2d 96, 97 (5th Cir. 1990).

Jackson’s motion to file a supplemental brief is DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackson v. Brown & Williamson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-brown-williamson-ca5-2000.