Jackson v. Brooks
This text of 1 White & W. 371 (Jackson v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 679. Plea in reconvention; trial upon, after plaintiff's cause has been dismissed. In a case where plaintiff sued on an account for rents, and defendant pleaded in reconvention an account due from plaintiff to himself, and on the day of trial plaintiff failed to appear, and his case was dismissed for want of prosecution, and defendant’s case, as made by his plea in reconvention, was tried [372]*372and judgment rendered in favor of defendant for the full amount set out in said plea, held, that it was not error, after dismissing plaintiff’s action, to try the case on the plea in reconvention of defendant. [Bradford v. Hamilton, 7 Tex. 55.] But, inasmuch as defendant in his plea in reconvention admitted that he owed the plaintiff the rent claimed, it was error, in rendering judgment for defendant, not to credit plaintiff the amount of rent so admitted to be due him.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 White & W. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-brooks-texapp-1878.