Jackson v. Bombard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. Bombard

62 A.D.2d 1000, 403 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11034

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 A.D.2d 1000 (Jackson v. Bombard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Bombard, 62 A.D.2d 1000, 403 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Parole which denied petitioner release on parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 1, 1976, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Consideration of petitioner’s past offenses and those offenses which gave rise to his present incarceration does not violate the criteria as set forth in sections 212 through 214 of the Correction Law (see Matter of Consilvio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 57 AD2d 955). No positive statutory requirement was violated by the board. Its discretion is therefore absolute and beyond court review (see Matter of Tomarkin v Bombard, 56 AD2d 881). Gulotta, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Parole which denied petitioner release on parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 1, 1976, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Consideration of petitioner’s past offenses and those offenses which gave rise to his present incarceration does not violate the criteria as set forth in sections 212 through 214 of the Correction Law (see Matter of Consilvio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 57 AD2d 955). No positive statutory requirement was violated by the board. Its discretion is therefore absolute and beyond court review (see Matter of Tomarkin v Bombard, 56 AD2d 881). Gulotta, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.2d 1000, 403 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-bombard-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack