Jackson v. Bobbitt

District Court, S.D. Georgia·Decided September 22, 2025·No. 6:23-cv-00012·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION

KEVIAS JACKSON, Plaintiff, | CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:23-cv-12 Vv. WARDEN JERMAIN WHITE, et al. Defendants.

ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation for the Court to grant as unopposed Defendants Boaen and White’s Motions to Dismiss and dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Boaen and White. Doc. 61. Plaintiff did not file Objections to this Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has elapsed. Accordingly, upon review, I find no clear error in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and ADOPT the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006) (If no specific objections are made or no objections are made at all, “the appropriate standard of review for the report and recommendation is clear error.”). I GRANT as unopposed Defendants Boaen and White's Motions to Dismiss and DISMISS Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Boaen and White. SO ORDERED, this 2” ke of September, 2025.

+PY- LL Lf fyog GALES LIE L HALL, CHAEF JUDGE STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Bobbitt, (S.D. Ga. 2025).

Jackson v. Bobbitt (Jackson v. Bobbitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc.
208 F. App'x 781 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)