Jackson v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

197 P.3d 59, 224 Or. App. 171, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1719
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 26, 2008
DocketA124608
StatusPublished

This text of 197 P.3d 59 (Jackson v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, 197 P.3d 59, 224 Or. App. 171, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1719 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

*172 PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision denying his request to reopen his case and to reconsider an order revoking his parole. We lack jurisdiction to review the order denying petitioner’s request. ORS 144.335(1) limits judicial review to final orders of the board. As the Supreme Court explained in Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 686, 159 P3d 1151 (2007), “a board order denying reopening and reconsideration of an earlier final order is not itself a final order for purposes of judicial review pursuant to ORS 144.335(1).” It follows that we lack jurisdiction to review the order before us.

Petition for judicial review dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mastriano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
159 P.3d 1151 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 P.3d 59, 224 Or. App. 171, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-board-of-parole-and-post-prison-supervision-orctapp-2008.