Home/Cal. District Court/Jackson v. Beers

Jackson v. Beers

1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 96
California District Court·Decided June 15, 1857·Published

Opinion

Norton, J.

This contract is not assignable during the continuance thereof, but must be performed by Gilbert & Stringer. The averment in the complaint of the performance by an agent or assignee is insufficient. Demurrer sustained with leave to amend.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Beers, 1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 96 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1857).

1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 96 (Jackson v. Beers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.