Jackson v. Beers
1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 96
This text of 1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 96 (Jackson v. Beers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California District Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson v. Beers, 1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 96 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1857).
Opinion
This contract is not assignable during the continuance thereof, but must be performed by Gilbert & Stringer. The averment in the complaint of the performance by an agent or assignee is insufficient. Demurrer sustained with leave to amend.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-beers-caldistct-1857.