Jackson v. Becker Roofing Co.

180 S.E. 822, 180 Ga. 769, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 560
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1935
DocketNo. 10457
StatusPublished

This text of 180 S.E. 822 (Jackson v. Becker Roofing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Becker Roofing Co., 180 S.E. 822, 180 Ga. 769, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 560 (Ga. 1935).

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

Equity -will- not take cognizance of a plain legal right, where an adequate and complete remedy is provided by law. Code of 1933, § 37-120. The plaintiff could have asserted by affidavit of illegality the defenses relied upon to defeat the execution which she is seeking to resist; and an equitable petition does not lie to enjoin proceedings under a levy, when the defendant in execution has an adequate remedy by illegality. Hitchcock v. Culver, 107 Ga. 184 (33 S. E. 35). As for the plaintiff’s claim of damages for malicious abuse of process and for recovery of attorney’s fees and other expenses of litigation, she had a complete and adequate remedy by suit at law. The court did not err in rendering the judgment refusing an injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoncur, except Gilbert, J., absent. W. 8. Norihcuit, for plaintiff. David S. Block, Bert E. Thomas, Morris Macks, B. J. Weaver, and Dorsey, Shelton & Pharr, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hitchcock v. Culver
33 S.E. 35 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 S.E. 822, 180 Ga. 769, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-becker-roofing-co-ga-1935.