Jackson v. Baessler

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided April 25, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-00628·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI ROBERT E. JACKSON, : Case No. 1:24-cv-628 Plaintiff, Judge Matthew W. McFarland

K. BAESSLER, et al., Defendants.

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry (Doc. 7), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations in its entirety. Moreover, the Court finds Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment against WCI Correctional is moot. Asamoah v. Tigerpoly Mfg., No. 2:20-CV-5376, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38295, at *9-10 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2022). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following: 1. Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Bishop is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. Plaintiff's claim against Defendant K. Baessler DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 8) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Heh wae By: JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Baessler, (S.D. Ohio 2025).

Jackson v. Baessler (Jackson v. Baessler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related