Jackson v. Augusta Southern Railroad
54 S.E. 697, 125 Ga. 801, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 282
This text of 54 S.E. 697 (Jackson v. Augusta Southern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson v. Augusta Southern Railroad, 54 S.E. 697, 125 Ga. 801, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 282 (Ga. 1906).
Opinion
In order to render a promissory note a sealed instrument, it must be so recited in the body of the note. The mere addition of a seal after the signature of the maker is insufficient. Civil Code, §3765; Chambers v. Kingsberry, 68 Ga. 828; Ridley v. Hightower, 112 Ga. 479; Echols v. Phillips, 112 Ga. 700.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hudson v. Sadtler
110 S.E.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Cadow v. Dixson Co.
84 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Alropa Corporation v. Rossee
86 F.2d 118 (Fifth Circuit, 1936)
Marshall v. Walker
178 S.E. 760 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Johnson v. International Agricultural Corp.
154 S.E. 465 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Baxley Hardware Co. v. Morris
140 S.E. 869 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Marbut v. Hamilton
122 S.E. 738 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Anderson v. Peteet
64 S.E. 284 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Burkhalter v. Perry & Brown
56 S.E. 631 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Thomason v. Wilson
56 S.E. 302 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Hawes v. Gloves
55 S.E. 62 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
54 S.E. 697, 125 Ga. 801, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-augusta-southern-railroad-ga-1906.