Jackson v. Atwater

New York Supreme Court

Jackson v. Atwater

26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 627

New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1880·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Hardin, J. ;

Talcott, P. J., and Smith, J., con-curred.

So much of the decree of the surrogate as credits the administratrix with the sum of $1,120 paid Eleanor A. Bradt reversed, ■and proceedings remitted to the surrogate of Cayuga county, with instructions to amend his decree accordingly, and as so amended, lis decree is affirmed ; the costs of both parties on this appeal to be paid out of the fund.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Hardin, J. ;

Talcott, P. J., and Smith, J., con-curred.

So much of the decree of the surrogate as credits the administratrix with the sum of $1,120 paid Eleanor A. Bradt reversed, ■and proceedings remitted to the surrogate of Cayuga county, with instructions to amend his decree accordingly, and as so amended, lis decree is affirmed ; the costs of both parties on this appeal to be paid out of the fund.

Jackson v. Atwater, 26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 627 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Pincite

26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 627 (Jackson v. Atwater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.