Jackson v. Angelone

49 F. App'x 415
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 F. App'x 582
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2002·No. 02-7222·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D’Andre Loverture Jackson appeals the magistrate judge’s order recommending dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Angelone, 49 F. App'x 415 (4th Cir. 2002).

49 F. App'x 415 (Jackson v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)