Jackson v. Anderson
This text of 58 P. 1026 (Jackson v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is an action in replevin brought without filing an affidavit in replevin or an undertaking. The case is here upon a transcript. No part of the evidence is before us.
It is alleged that the trial court committed error in sustaining an objection to further testimony upon the trial after the plaintiff had been sworn and examined.
We do not know what the testimony of the plaintiff was. It is not before us, and the error assigned cannot be considered. It is presumed that the evidence was such as would justify the trial court in refusing to hear further testimony. The other errors assigned are not sufficient to require a reversal.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 P. 1026, 9 Kan. App. 666, 1899 Kan. App. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-anderson-kanctapp-1899.