Jackson v. Albright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. Albright

250 A.D. 835, 296 N.Y.S. 467, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9227

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 1937·Published

Opinion

Order modified by providing that the right to open and close shaU first be accorded to plaintiffs Cody and Mackenzie and subject to such right, shall be accorded to the plaintiff Robert S. Jackson, and as modified affirmed, without costs on this appeal to any party. AH concur. (The order grants motion for consolidation of six actions brought to recover damages sustained in an automobile accident.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by providing that the right to open and close shaU first be accorded to plaintiffs Cody and Mackenzie and subject to such right, shall be accorded to the plaintiff Robert S. Jackson, and as modified affirmed, without costs on this appeal to any party. AH concur. (The order grants motion for consolidation of six actions brought to recover damages sustained in an automobile accident.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Jackson v. Albright, 250 A.D. 835, 296 N.Y.S. 467, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9227 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

250 A.D. 835 (Jackson v. Albright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.