Jackson v. Adams Adams Construction

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMarch 1, 2011
DocketI.C. NOS. W23436 PH-2373.
StatusPublished

This text of Jackson v. Adams Adams Construction (Jackson v. Adams Adams Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Adams Adams Construction, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2011).

Opinion

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms with modifications, the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Rideout.

***********
ISSUES
The issues in contention are:

1. Did Plaintiff sustain a compensable injury by accident on May 4, 2009? *Page 2

2. If so, what, if any, additional medical treatment or financial compensation is due?

3. Are Defendants subject to the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act?

4. What sanctions, if any, are appropriate?

***********
Based upon all of the competent credible evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Plaintiff was 34 years old. Plaintiff completed the tenth grade and later obtained his high school diploma in 2008. Plaintiff's vocational history consists solely of painting.

2. In 2008, Plaintiff, Dale Morton, and George Stone began painting a "spec" house being constructed by Bill Adams and Adams Adams Construction. Plaintiff and Mr. Morton worked for George Stone Painting which was owned by George Stone. By mid 2008, the painting on that house stopped.

3. In early to mid 2009, a disagreement arose between George Stone and Bill Adams about work that Mr. Adams felt had not been completed, even though Mr. Stone had been paid. As a result of that disagreement, Mr. Stone returned to the "spec" house, alone, and started painting. Plaintiff and Mr. Morton found out about Mr. Stone painting the house alone and went to assist him. The two were working without pay at that time.

4. Steve Davidson worked on the same job site for Adams Adams Construction. The greater weight of the evidence shows that Mr. Davidson was an employee of Adams Adams Construction. *Page 3

5. In the days before May 4, 2009, another disagreement arose between Mr. Stone and Mr. Adams which caused Mr. Stone to walk off the job site at the "spec" house. Plaintiff and Mr. Morton were asked by Mr. Adams to finish the painting job. Both Plaintiff and Mr. Morton completed the painting job and were paid by Adams Adams Construction.

6. On May 4, 2009, Plaintiff and Mr. Morton were painting the front exterior of the "spec house." Plaintiff was looking up while painting the trim around the front door when he stepped backward off the brick threshold. His ankle rolled causing him to fall to the ground. During the fall, Plaintiff extended his left arm to catch himself and fell onto that left arm causing injury. The fall was not witnessed. Mr. Morton walked around the side of the house and did not witness Plaintiff's fall. Plaintiff immediately reported the fall and injury to both Mr. Morton and Mr. Adams.

7. Plaintiff presented to Bladen County Hospital Emergency Room on the date of injury complaining of left arm and wrist discomfort. An x-ray taken at the time returned negative results for fracture. Plaintiff was referred to Cape Fear Orthopedics but was unable to get additional treatment due to his lack of funds.

8. At the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Plaintiff continued to suffer from pain, weakness, and numbness and tingling in the left arm. Plaintiff's symptoms had waxed and waned since the injury but had always been present.

9. Although Plaintiff continued to look for work, due the severity of his pain, he was unable to work until he moved to Charlotte, North Carolina where he took a job with Labor Ready on October 22, 2009. Labor Ready paid Plaintiff $7.25 per hour for 40 hours per week. The Full Commission finds Plaintiff's ability to earn wages with Labor Ready to be indicative of wage earning capacity. There was testimony about Plaintiff returning work for Mr. Stone. *Page 4 However, the evidence was not clear if Plaintiff's return to work with Mr. Stone was before or after Plaintiff's work with Labor Ready. Mr. Morton also testified about Plaintiff's alleged painting work directly after the May 4, 2009 injury. The Full Commission finds Mr. Morton's testimony not credible.

10. There was conflicting testimony about who employed Plaintiff and Mr. Morton in the days before the accident. Plaintiff and Mr. Stone indicated that Mr. Adams hired them and controlled their work. Mr. Adams and Mr. Morton testified that Plaintiff and Mr. Morton were still working for Mr. Stone at the time of the accident.

11. Mr. Adams did not have a valid workers' compensation policy at the time of the accident and had not acquired a valid certificate of workers' compensation insurance from Mr. Stone.

12. The greater weight of the evidence shows and the Full Commission finds that Plaintiff was an employee of George Stone. However, Adams Adams Construction is liable pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-19 because it did not procure a certificate of insurance from Mr. Stone.

13. The evidence shows that Mr. Stone only had two employees so he would not have been required to have worker's compensation insurance. Therefore, George Stone Painting and/or George Stone are not necessary parties to this action.

14. At the time of injury, Plaintiff was making $15 per hour while working on the "spec" house for Mr. Adams. The Full Commission finds that Plaintiff would have been working four hours per day. Therefore, Plaintiff's average weekly wage is $300. *Page 5

15. Mr. Adams and Mr. Morton testified that Plaintiff smoked marijuana just before his injury occurred. Plaintiff denied that allegation. Defendants have presented insufficient evidence under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-12 that Plaintiff was intoxicated at the time of his injury.

16. Defendants have put forth no evidence that Plaintiff's alleged intoxication or being under the influence was a proximate cause of the May 4, 2009 fall.

***********
Based upon the foregoing Stipulations and Findings of Fact, the Full Commission makes the following:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Plaintiff's claim is subject to the North Carolina Worker's Compensation Act and the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction over this matter. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-19.

2. Plaintiff sustained a compensable injury by accident to his left arm on May 4, 2009 while painting the "spec" house for Mr. Adams. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2.

3. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-19,

[a]ny principal contractor, intermediate contractor, or subcontractor who shall sublet any contract for the performance of any work without requiring from such subcontractor or obtaining from the Industrial Commission a certificate, issued by a workers' compensation insurance carrier, or a certificate of compliance issued by the Department of Insurance to a self-insured subcontractor, stating that such subcontractor has complied with G.S. 97-93

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Demery v. Perdue Farms, Inc.
545 S.E.2d 485 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution
425 S.E.2d 454 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.
290 S.E.2d 682 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackson v. Adams Adams Construction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-adams-adams-construction-ncworkcompcom-2011.