JACKSON, TAVON, PEOPLE v

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 2015
DocketKA 13-02075
StatusPublished

This text of JACKSON, TAVON, PEOPLE v (JACKSON, TAVON, PEOPLE v) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JACKSON, TAVON, PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

362 KA 13-02075 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TAVON JACKSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

STEVEN J. GETMAN, OVID, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BARRY L. PORSCH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WATERLOO, FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Seneca County Court (Dennis F. Bender, J.), rendered August 13, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 205.25). Defendant's contention that the plea was not knowing and voluntary and that County Court therefore erred in denying his motion to withdraw the plea survives his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Lawrence, 118 AD3d 1501, 1501). We conclude, however, that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion inasmuch as defendant’s “allegations in support of the motion [were] belied by [his] statements during the plea proceeding” (People v Williams, 103 AD3d 1128, 1128, lv denied 21 NY3d 915; see People v Farley, 34 AD3d 1229, 1230, lv denied 8 NY3d 880). The record establishes that defendant pleaded guilty voluntarily, that he was satisfied with the representation provided by defense counsel, and that he understood the proceedings.

Entered: March 27, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bell
988 N.E.2d 1285 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
People v. Farley
34 A.D.3d 1229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Williams
103 A.D.3d 1128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Lawrence
118 A.D.3d 1501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
JACKSON, TAVON, PEOPLE v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-tavon-people-v-nyappdiv-2015.