Jackson (Royal) v. State
This text of Jackson (Royal) v. State (Jackson (Royal) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ROYAL ANTHONY JACKSON, No. 85083 Appellant, vs. F1L D THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. AUG 4 2022 I A. BROWN PREM COURT BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPU CLERK
This is a pro se notice of appeal from a district court order for summary punishment of contempt committed in the immediate view and presence of the court and an order to appear in proper person. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from such orders in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty
, J. Stiglich Herndon
cc: Hon. Jasmin D. Lilly-Spells, District Judge Royal Anthony Jackson Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT John J. Piro OF NEVADA
ic lo 1947A - 2LA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jackson (Royal) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-royal-v-state-nev-2022.