Jackson (Robert) Vs. The Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2020·No. 80584·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROBERT STEPHEN JACKSON, No. 80584 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED

0

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE FEB 2 7 aVes RONALD J. ISRAEL, DISTRICT EL cou

JUDGE, .,‘.......

DEMI-1Y CLERK

Res ondents.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking a writ directing the district court to comply with the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States and Nevada Constitutions.

We have considered the petition, and we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.170; NRAP 21(b)(1). We reiterate that Ipletitioned I carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Pickering

Ade. C.J.

J.

Hardesty Cadish

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A AVM ur 0-ors

is:

Robert Stephen Jackson Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 40fr. 2 _ i A.AttiM111111 l;)i.

kligtd1 i.111 MIK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson (Robert) Vs. The Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., (Neb. 2020).

Jackson (Robert) Vs. The Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (Jackson (Robert) Vs. The Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related