Jackson & Reno v. Ewell

Supreme Court of Virginia

Jackson & Reno v. Ewell

4 Munf. 426

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedMarch 28, 1815

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 4 Munf. 426 (Jackson & Reno v. Ewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson & Reno v. Ewell, 4 Munf. 426 (Va. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Roane

pronounced the court’s opinion, that there was no error in the judgment of the superior court of law, so far as it reversed the judgment of the county court, but that the said superior court erred in not proceeding to render such judgment as the county court ought to have rendered.

Both judgments reversed (with costs to the defendant as being the party substantially prevailing,) and judgment entered, that the plaintiffs take nothing by their motion, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Roane

pronounced the court’s opinion, that there was no error in the judgment of the superior court of law, so far as it reversed the judgment of the county court, but that the said superior court erred in not proceeding to render such judgment as the county court ought to have rendered.

Both judgments reversed (with costs to the defendant as being the party substantially prevailing,) and judgment entered, that the plaintiffs take nothing by their motion, &c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Munf. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-reno-v-ewell-va-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack