Jackson, Jr. (Ralph) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 21, 2016·No. 69669·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RALPH FOSTER JACKSON, JR., No. 69669 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.

MAR 2 1 2016

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

BY y

TRACIE K LINDEMAN CLERISJOR §UPREME COURT

DEPUTY

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for leave of court. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David B. Barker, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned decision, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

1-14.A.LA

Hardesty

rjagf Saitta Pickering Ackm

"In light of this order, we deny as moot the pro se letter requesting appointment of counsel.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A e IG-0884S

cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Ralph Foster Jackson, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1.947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson, Jr. (Ralph) v. State, (Neb. 2016).

Jackson, Jr. (Ralph) v. State (Jackson, Jr. (Ralph) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)