Jackson, ex rel. McLean v. Caywood

7 Wend. 246
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1831
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Wend. 246 (Jackson, ex rel. McLean v. Caywood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson, ex rel. McLean v. Caywood, 7 Wend. 246 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).

Opinion

By the Court

Nelson, J.

The defendant is not entitled to his improvements, under the second section of the “ act concerning lands in the military tract,” passed the 8th April, 1813, 1 R. L. 303, according to the decision in the case of Jackson v. Chapman, 3 Cowen, 390 ; and the construction there given of that section, making its operation exclusively retrospective, necessarily precludes the defendant from the benefit of the limitation upon persons claiming title • to dead soldier lots, contained in the fourth section ; that limitation in express terms operates in favor only of settlers described in the second section; and by the above decision they must have “ actually settled” on the land before the passing of the act, on the 8th April, 1813, to come within its provisions.

The plaintiff must have judgment of the whole lot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stilwell v. Staples
4 Rob. 639 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Wend. 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-rel-mclean-v-caywood-nysupct-1831.