Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Bell
160 S.E. 283, 201 N.C. 336, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 232
This text of 160 S.E. 283 (Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Bell, 160 S.E. 283, 201 N.C. 336, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 232 (N.C. 1931).
Opinion
Without detailing the evidence it is sufficient to say that it falls short of making out a case against the defendant Porter. At least, the appellant, who is required to handle the laboring oar, has failed to overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Weinstein v. City of Raleigh
14 S.E.2d 661 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Kelly v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
183 S.E. 376 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
LaNeve v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
176 S.E. 560 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Tuttle v. . Bell
165 S.E. 333 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Baker v. . Clayton
164 S.E. 233 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Mangum v. . Winstead
162 S.E. 557 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Frazier v. Piedmont & Northern Railway Co.
161 S.E. 689 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
160 S.E. 283, 201 N.C. 336, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-rel-jackson-v-bell-nc-1931.