Jackson, Ex Parte Raymond Earl

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 19, 2009
DocketAP-76,195
StatusPublished

This text of Jackson, Ex Parte Raymond Earl (Jackson, Ex Parte Raymond Earl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson, Ex Parte Raymond Earl, (Tex. 2009).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. AP-76,195 & AP-76,196

EX PARTE RAYMOND EARL JACKSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F-0455434-MH, F-0455330-MH IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two

violations of protective orders. Upon revocation of his community supervision, he was sentenced to

eight years’ imprisonment for each violation. He did not appeal his convictions.

Applicant contends that he was denied the right to appeal because he was not informed that

he had a right to appeal the revocations of his community supervision and no notices of appeal were

filed. 2

After a remand for a response from counsel and additional findings and conclusions, the trial

court determined that Applicant was denied his right to appeal the revocations of community

supervision. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to out-of-time appeal in the judgments of

conviction in Case Nos. F-0455434-MH and F-0455330-MH from the Criminal District Court of

Dallas County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of

appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues.

Delivered: August 19, 2009 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackson, Ex Parte Raymond Earl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-parte-raymond-earl-texcrimapp-2009.