Jackson ex dem. Whitman v. Douglas

New York Supreme Court

Jackson ex dem. Whitman v. Douglas

8 Johns. 367

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1811

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 8 Johns. 367 (Jackson ex dem. Whitman v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson ex dem. Whitman v. Douglas, 8 Johns. 367 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is not a sufficient cause for interfering with the verdict. There was no uncertainty originally, as to the true location of the lots. It is very clear that the defendant possesses beyond the true line, between great lots No. 7. and 8. and the single fact, that one of the lessors of the plaintiff, about eight years ago, showed a mistaken line as the true line, is not, of itself, sufficient to conclude him, in this case. The motion is, therefore, denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is not a sufficient cause for interfering with the verdict. There was no uncertainty originally, as to the true location of the lots. It is very clear that the defendant possesses beyond the true line, between great lots No. 7. and 8. and the single fact, that one of the lessors of the plaintiff, about eight years ago, showed a mistaken line as the true line, is not, of itself, sufficient to conclude him, in this case. The motion is, therefore, denied.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Johns. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-whitman-v-douglas-nysupct-1811.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack