Jackson ex dem. Walker v. Flint

New York Supreme Court

Jackson ex dem. Walker v. Flint

2 Cow. 594

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1824

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 2 Cow. 594 (Jackson ex dem. Walker v. Flint) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson ex dem. Walker v. Flint, 2 Cow. 594 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia.

The title set up by Alonzo Flint, and upon which he applies to be made co-defendant, is in plain hostility to that under which the defendant claims. The latter is a purchaser of Packard, who purchased of Henry and gave a mortgage, as assignee of which the lessor claims. The object of Alonzo is to defeat the title acquired under Packard. There is nothing like the relation of landlord and tenant between Alonzo and Fowler, or Alonzo and Adolphus.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

The title set up by Alonzo Flint, and upon which he applies to be made co-defendant, is in plain hostility to that under which the defendant claims. The latter is a purchaser of Packard, who purchased of Henry and gave a mortgage, as assignee of which the lessor claims. The object of Alonzo is to defeat the title acquired under Packard. There is nothing like the relation of landlord and tenant between Alonzo and Fowler, or Alonzo and Adolphus.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cow. 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-walker-v-flint-nysupct-1824.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack