Jackson ex dem. Wadsworth v. Wendell
12 Johns. 355
Opinion
Several objections are stated as to the sufficiency of the instrument from Thomas to Wadsworth, to convey a title [356]*356to the lot in question. It is unnecessary to take notice of any other than the one, that the instrument is without a seal. This alone is fatal to the plaintiff’s title, according to the decision of this court, in Jackson, ex dem. Gouch, v. Wood.
Judgment for the defendant.
Ante, 73.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson ex dem. Wadsworth v. Wendell, 12 Johns. 355 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).
12 Johns. 355 (Jackson ex dem. Wadsworth v. Wendell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Town of Solon v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank
42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Wilcox v. Randall
7 Barb. 633 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)