Jackson ex dem. Wadsworth v. Wendell

12 Johns. 355
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1815·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Several objections are stated as to the sufficiency of the instrument from Thomas to Wadsworth, to convey a title [356]*356to the lot in question. It is unnecessary to take notice of any other than the one, that the instrument is without a seal. This alone is fatal to the plaintiff’s title, according to the decision of this court, in Jackson, ex dem. Gouch, v. Wood.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Wadsworth v. Wendell, 12 Johns. 355 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).

12 Johns. 355 (Jackson ex dem. Wadsworth v. Wendell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Solon v. Williamsburgh Savings Bank
42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Wilcox v. Randall
7 Barb. 633 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)