Jackson ex dem. Van Alen v. Vischer
2 Johns. Cas. 106
This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 106 (Jackson ex dem. Van Alen v. Vischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson ex dem. Van Alen v. Vischer, 2 Johns. Cas. 106 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
Although at the time of signing the rule, the plea ought to have been put in, yet the entering the default *in this manner was improper. It should have been against the casual ejector, according to the terms of the consent rule. There can be no judgment by default against the tenant.
Rule granted.(
(a) Grah. Prac. 2d ed. 222, et seq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Cas. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-van-alen-v-vischer-nysupct-1800.