Jackson, ex dem. v. Van Antwerp
1 Wend. 295
This text of 1 Wend. 295 (Jackson, ex dem. v. Van Antwerp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson, ex dem. v. Van Antwerp, 1 Wend. 295 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).
Opinion
By the Court,
The party in interest is liable for the costs. Take a rule that James Wadsworth pay the same, or that he shew cause by the first day of the next term, why an attachment should not issue against him.
Motion granted.
Parties in interest suing in the names of others, have uniformly been adjudged to pay costs. (20 Johns. R. 475. 2 Cowen, 460. 5 Cowen, 17.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hiscock v. Tuck
122 A.D. 116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Johnston v. Mann's Executors
21 W. Va. 15 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1882)
Perrigo v. Dowdall
32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)
Hallett v. Hastie
35 Ala. 164 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)
The Farmers' Loan and Trust Co. v. . Kursch
5 N.Y. 558 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)
Scott v. John
15 Ala. 566 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)
Ryers v. Hedges
1 Hill & Den. 646 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Wend. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-v-van-antwerp-nysupct-1828.