Jackson, ex dem. v. Van Antwerp
1 Wend. 295
Opinion
By the Court,
The party in interest is liable for the costs. Take a rule that James Wadsworth pay the same, or that he shew cause by the first day of the next term, why an attachment should not issue against him.
Motion granted.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson, ex dem. v. Van Antwerp, 1 Wend. 295 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).
1 Wend. 295 (Jackson, ex dem. v. Van Antwerp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hiscock v. Tuck
122 A.D. 116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Johnston v. Mann's Executors
21 W. Va. 15 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1882)
Perrigo v. Dowdall
32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)
Hallett v. Hastie
35 Ala. 164 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)
The Farmers' Loan and Trust Co. v. . Kursch
5 N.Y. 558 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)
Scott v. John
15 Ala. 566 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)
Ryers v. Hedges
1 Hill & Den. 646 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)